ArticleJAMA internal medicine2025
Effectiveness of Empagliflozin vs Dapagliflozin for Kidney Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing-dependent renal protection of dapagliflozin in endotoxemic diabetic mice by real-time GFR and biomarkers.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Cardiorenal Outcomes of Dapagliflozin vs. Empagliflozin in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin for kidney outcomes in stage 3 chronic kidney disease: a propensity score-matched multi-center cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Differential Acute Kidney Injury Profiles of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is: A Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Finerenone as an add-on treatment to conventional therapies for the patients with diabetic kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin Outcomes in Heart Failure.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin to Standard Treatment for Diabetic Kidney Disease in China.Clinical drug investigation · 2025Article
- Research progress on non-coding RNA regulatory networks and targeted therapy in diabetic nephropathy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: No large randomized clinical trial has directly compared empagliflozin with dapagliflozin, leaving their comparative effectiveness regarding kidney outcomes unknown. Objective: To compare kidney outcomes between initiation of empagliflozin vs dapagliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes who were receiving antihyperglycemic treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This target trial emulation used nationwide, population-based routinely collected Danish health care data to compare initiation of empagliflozin vs dapagliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes who received antihyperglycemic treatment between June 1, 2014, and October 31, 2020. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to August 2024. Persons were followed up until an outcome, emigration, death, 6 years, or December 31, 2021, whichever occurred first. Exposure: Initiation of empagliflozin vs dapagliflozin. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included acute kidney injury, incident chronic kidney disease (stages G3 to G5 or stage A2 or A3), and progression of chronic kidney disease (≥40% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline). Risks of kidney outcomes were estimated in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using an Aalen-Johansen estimator that adjusted for 56 potential confounders and considered death as a competing event. Results: A total of 32 819 individuals who initiated treatment with empagliflozin and 17 464 with dapagliflozin were included (median [IQR] age, 63 [54-71] years; 18 872 female individuals [37.5%]; median [IQR] estimated glomerular filtration rate, 88 [73-104] mL/min/1.73 m2). After weighting, all measured covariates were well balanced between the groups. In intention-to-treat analyses, people who initiated treatment with empagliflozin and dapagliflozin exhibited comparable 6-year risks of acute kidney injury (18.2% vs 18.5%; risk ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.06), chronic kidney disease stages G3 to G5 (11.8% vs 12.1%; risk ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.05), chronic kidney disease stage A2 or A3 (14.8% vs 14.3%; risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93-1.15), and progression of chronic kidney disease (5.3% vs 5.7%; risk ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.56-1.58). The primary analyses were supported by corresponding per-protocol analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that people with type 2 diabetes who initiated treatment with empagliflozin and dapagliflozin had comparable long-term kidney outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.