Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39836379›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2025

Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) assisted analysis of characteristics of graft dehiscence after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for failed penetrating keratoplasty.

Pratima Vishwakarma, Mert Mestanoglu, Veronika Welge-Lüßen, Simona Schlereth, Claus Cursiefen, Björn Bachmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. DMEK, DSAEK, and repeat PKP for endothelial failure after PKP: systematic review and meta-analysis with a graphical synthesis of clinical decision factors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pratima VishwakarmaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3373-904X
Mert MestanogluDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Veronika Welge-LüßenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Simona SchlerethDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Claus CursiefenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Björn BachmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 1607; www.crc1607.de; MM, SS, CC, BB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyse anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) parameters of graft dehiscence after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for graft failure post penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

methodsRetrospective evaluation of AS-OCT images of 142 dehiscences post-DMEK in 75 eyes. Dehiscences' size, depth, location, correlation with graft-host interface (GHI) override and step at GHI were assessed.

resultsThe majority of patients were male (58.7%) and mean age was 67 ± 13.6 years. Multiple dehiscences were observed in 49.3% eyes. Rebubbling was required once in 72% and multiple times in 24% eyes. Among 142 dehiscences, crossing over GHI was noted in 53.5%. The median distance of peripheral edge of dehiscences from GHI was 0.21 mm. Steps at GHI were noted in 41.5% where 22.5% dehiscences with step crossed the GHI. For dehiscences crossing versus not crossing GHI, no significant difference was noted in median depth (p = 0.268) and size (p = 0.206). For dehiscences crossing over GHI with presence versus absence of step, median depth (p = 0.23) and size (p = 0.196) showed no significant difference. No significant difference was noted in dehiscences' median depth (p = 0.16) and size (p = 0.926) among different step sizes. Incidence of dehiscence with or without steps (p = 0.8853) and graded as per size of steps, showed no significant difference.

conclusionSize and depth of dehiscence were not influenced by their crossing over GHI or the presence and size of steps. Dehiscences typically occurred in close vicinity to GHI, suggesting that DMEK graft should be placed 0.25 mm centrally from the prior PK interface, independent of GHI irregularities.

Indexed as

Anterior Eye SegmentCorneal DiseasesDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyGraft RejectionKeratoplasty, PenetratingSurgical Wound DehiscenceTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVisual Acuityanterior segment optical coherence tomographydescemet membrane endothelial keratoplastygraft dehiscencegraft failurepenetrating keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID39836379
PMCPMC12069968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.