Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39836290›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Efficacy of prophylactic laxatives against opioid-induced constipation: retrospective propensity score matching analysis.

Yuka Okuda, Toshiyuki Kuriyama, Yoshi Tsukiyama, Toshio Shimokawa, Ke Wan, Tomoyuki Kawamata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuka OkudaDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama-Shi, 641-8509, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7883-3940
Toshiyuki KuriyamaDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama-Shi, 641-8509, Japan. kuriyama@wakayama-med.ac.jp.
Yoshi TsukiyamaDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama-Shi, 641-8509, Japan.
Toshio ShimokawaClinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Ke WanClinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Tomoyuki KawamataDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama-Shi, 641-8509, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOpioid-induced constipation (OIC) is problematic for patients with cancer receiving opioid therapy. Some guidelines recommend initiating regular laxatives at the same time as opioid analgesics. However, the effectiveness of prophylactic laxatives on OIC has not been widely demonstrated. We therefore examined the incidence of OIC among patients with and without prophylactic laxatives within one week after initiating strong opioid analgesics and the factors associated with the incidence of OIC.

methodsEligible patients were adults with cancer for whom strong opioid analgesics were initiated after admission and who remained hospitalized for over a week. Propensity score matching analysis was used to compare outcomes after adjusting for patient background.

resultsIn total, 928 patients were enrolled, from which 536 were selected after propensity score matching analysis. The incidence of OIC in patients with prophylactic laxatives was not significantly different from that without prophylactic laxatives (48.1% vs 48.9%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-1.36). In multivariable logistic analysis, age ≥ 65 years (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.19) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥ 3 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.04-2.77) were associated with a higher incidence of OIC.

conclusionProphylactic laxatives did not affect the incidence of OIC in our study. Our results suggest that prophylactic laxatives are not necessarily required when initiating opioid therapy. In addition, we found that age ≥ 65 years and ECOG PS ≥ 3 were associated in our study with a higher incidence of OIC.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidConstipationLaxativesOpioid-Induced ConstipationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCancer PainFemaleHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsAnalgesics, OpioidLaxativesCancer painECOG PSOpioid-induced constipationProphylactic laxatives

Identifiers

PMID39836290
PMCPMC11750890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.