ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Impact of lesion preparation-induced calcified plaque defects in vascular intervention for atherosclerotic disease: in silico assessment.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection: detection, management, and prevention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Computational modeling of drug-eluting balloons in peripheral artery disease: Mechanisms, optimization, and translational insights.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Connexin-43 Protein Expression Pattern Analysis in Myocardial Infarction Tissues.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary interventions in highly calcified atherosclerotic lesions are challenging due to the high mechanical stiffness that significantly restricts stent expansion. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel vessel preparation technique with the potential to improve interventional outcomes by inducing microscopic and macroscopic cracks to enhance stent expansion. However, the exact mechanism of action for IVL is poorly understood, and it remains unclear whether the improvement in-stent expansion is caused by either the macro-cracks allowing the vessel to open or the micro-cracks altering the bulk material properties. In silico models offer a robust means to examine (a) diverse lesion morphologies, (b) a range of lesion modifications to address these deficiencies, and (c) the correlation between calcium morphology alteration and improved stenting outcomes. These models also help identify which lesions would benefit the most from IVL. In this study, we develop an in silico model of stent expansion to study the effect of macro-crack morphology on interventional outcomes in clinically inspired geometries. Larger IVL-induced defects promote more post-stent lumen gain. IVL seems to induce better stenting outcomes for large calcified lesions. IVL defects that split calcified plaque in two parts are the most beneficial for stenting angioplasty, regardless of the calcified plaque size. Location of the IVL defect does not seem to matter with respect to lumen gain. These findings underscore the potential of IVL to enhance lesion compliance and improve clinical outcomes in PCI. The macroscopic defects induced by IVL seem to have a substantial impact on post-stent outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.