ArticleMolecular biology reports2025
Evaluation of variations in predominant gut microbiota members in inflammatory bowel disease using real-time PCR.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a persistent ailment that impacts many individuals worldwide. The interaction between the immune system and gut microbiome is thought to influence IBD development. This study aimed to assess some microbiota in IBD patients compared to healthy individuals. The investigation involved a selected group of twenty patients suffering from IBD and an equal number of healthy participants. Stool specimens were obtained and analyzed for Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Clostridium leptum, Akkermansia muciniphila, Fusobacterium and Enterobacteriaceae using real-time PCR. The findings indicated significantly higher levels of Bifidobacterium in IBD patients (Pv = 0.009) and lower levels of A. muciniphila (Pv = 0.003) healthy individuals. Other bacteria tested did not show significant differences. The study suggests that the progression of IBD patients could be influenced by the rising of Bifidobacterium and the declining of A. muciniphila. Targeting these bacteria could lead to improved treatments and quality of life for those with IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39836282What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.