Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39836212›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025

iForensic, multicentric validation of digital whole slide images (WSI) in forensic histopathology setting according to the College of American Pathologists guidelines.

Nicola Pigaiani, Antonio Oliva, Vito Cirielli, Simone Grassi, Vincenzo Arena, Luca-Maria Solari, Naomi Tatriele, Dario Raniero, Matteo Brunelli, Stefano Gobbo and 5 more

Abstract readValidation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nicola PigaianiUnit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. nicola.pigaiani@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-4955
Antonio OlivaSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7112-9096
Vito CirielliUnit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-2318
Simone GrassiSection of Forensic Medical Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2420-6658
Vincenzo ArenaInstitute of Anatomical Pathology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4363-6311
Luca-Maria SolariUnit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Naomi TatrieleUnit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Dario RanieroUnit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-8602
Matteo BrunelliUnit of Pathology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-2676
Stefano GobboUnit of Pathology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-5233
Aldo ScarpaUnit of Pathology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1678-739X
Liron PantanowitzDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8182-5503
Pamela RodegherUnit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Federica BortolottiUnit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9568-4585
Francesco AusaniaUnit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-8551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathology has benefited from the rapid progress of image-digitizing technology during the last decade. However, the application of digital whole slide images (WSI) in forensic pathology still needs to be improved. WSI validation is crucial to ensure diagnostic performance, at least equivalent to glass slides and light microscopy. The College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recently updated internal digital pathology system validation recommendations. Following these guidelines, this pilot study aimed to validate the performance of a digital approach for forensic histopathological diagnosis. Six independent skilled forensic pathologists from different forensic medicine institutes evaluated 100 glass slides of forensic interest (80 stained with standard hematoxylin and eosin, 20 with special staining), including different organs and tissues, with light microscopy (Olympus BX51, Tokyo, Japan). Glass slides were scanned using the Aperio GT 450 DX Digital Slides Scanner (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany). After two wash-out weeks, forensic pathologists evaluated WSIs in front of a widescreen using computer devices with dedicated software (O3 viewer, O3 Enterprise, Zucchetti, Trieste, Italy). Side-by-side comparisons between diagnoses performed on tissue glass slides versus WSIs were above the threshold stated in the validation guidelines (mean concordance of 97.8%). CSUQ Version 3 questionnaire showed high satisfaction for all pathologists (mean result: 6.6/7). Our institutional digital forensic pathology system has been validated for practical casework application. This approach opens new scenarios in practical forensic casework investigations, such as sharing live histological ex-glass slides online, as well as educational and research perspectives, with improving impacts on the whole daily workflow.

Indexed as

Forensic PathologyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansMicroscopyPathologistsPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsDigital forensic histopathologyDigital glassDigital whole slide imagesForensic pathologyMethod validation

Identifiers

PMID39836212
PMCPMC12003450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.