ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Left ventricular rigor mortis interferes with postmortem aortic root geometry.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic regurgitation is a common valve disease and can be caused by delineated findings such as fenestrations or hardly discernible alterations of the aortic root geometry. Therefore, aortic regurgitation can be a challenging diagnosis during an autopsy. Cardiac surgeons, however, are confronted with comparable problems during surgery and have developed a refined knowledge of the anatomy of the aortic root including its geometry. Transferring this knowledge from the operating room to the dissection would further complement the panel of postmortem diagnostic tools. To foster translation of the clinical anatomy, the present study assessed the impact of postmortem peculiarities (i.e. myocardial rigor mortis, putrefaction) that might influence aortic root geometry. The aortic root geometry was described by aortic perimeters (basal, sinus, sino-tubular junction, and ascending aorta), effective height (distance from the cusp's free margin to its nadir), geometric height (cusp height), commissural height (distance from the base of an interleaflet triangle to the end of a commissure), and length of the ascending aorta. Data from 140 cases were analyzed (linear regression, comparative testing). Myocardial rigor mortis was associated with smaller basal rings. Weak positive correlations between the duration of the postmortem interval and aortic root dimensions were observed. In summary, postmortem peculiarities, especially the myocardial cadaveric rigidity, influence postmortem aortic root geometry. Despite these circumstances, the current study demonstrates that aortic root geometric assessment, including effective height, is feasible in a postmortem setting. Further studies are needed to elaborate on aortic root geometry as a diagnostic tool in a necropsy setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.