Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39836209›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Treatment algorithm following first-line therapy failure in metastatic prostate cancer].

Christian Thomas, Axel S Merseburger

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christian ThomasKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland. Christian.Thomas@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Axel S MerseburgerKlinik für Urologie, Campus Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the current treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following the failure of first-line therapy. Although significant progress has been made in the primary treatment of hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, the management of mCRPC remains a clinical challenge. The article outlines the diagnostic criteria for mCRPC, which can be confirmed through biochemical progression and imaging techniques. Various drug classes are available for the treatment of mCRPC after first-line therapy failure, including androgen receptor signaling pathway inhibitors (ARPI), chemotherapeutics such as docetaxel and cabazitaxel, as well as newer agents like poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based radioligand therapies. These agents are used as monotherapy or in combination, depending on the patient's status and treatment history. Choosing the appropriate follow-up therapy after first-line failure is often difficult because current study results are mostly based on older treatment concepts. Precise, molecular-based treatment planning could play a key role here. Molecular markers such as BRCA 1/2 mutations and imaging techniques like PSMA-PET/CT can help identify the most suitable therapy for individual patients. For example, patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations may benefit from a combination of PARP and ARPI therapy, while those with high PSMA levels may be considered for PSMA radioligand therapy. Thus, therapeutic options for the treatment of mCRPC are now diverse and promising, with the challenge being to determine the right sequences and combinations based on the individual patient profile.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAntineoplastic AgentsHumansMaleTreatment FailureAntineoplastic AgentsCombination therapyMonotherapyPoly(ADP-ribose) polymeraseSystemic therapyTaxanes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.