Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39836198›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2025

How does an intervention work?-English Version : Development of an effect model for a complex intervention to prevent recurring or persistent pain using the example of PAIN 2.0.

Ulrike Kaiser, Leonie Schouten, Greta Hoffmann, Anke Preißler, Franziska Adler, Louise Zinndorf, Anne Kästner, Beatrice Metz-Oster, Enya Höffner, Gabriele Lindena and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ulrike KaiserUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Leonie SchoutenPain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. leonie.schouten@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Greta HoffmannUniversity Pain Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Anke PreißlerUniversity Pain Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Franziska AdlerPain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Louise ZinndorfGerman Red Cross Pain Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Anne KästnerPain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Beatrice Metz-OsterGerman Red Cross Pain Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Enya HöffnerGerman Red Cross Pain Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Gabriele LindenaGerman Pain Society, Berlin, Germany.
PAIN 2.0-Team
Thomas KohlmannInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Sandra Meyer-MoockInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Daniel Szczotkowski
Christian GeberGerman Red Cross Pain Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Frank PetzkePain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Lena MilchGerman Red Cross Pain Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Anne GärtnerUniversity Pain Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to the usual evaluation approach (usually a clinical randomized trial in the sense of the question: does an intervention work), complex interventions require further systematic investigations to prove their effectiveness. The role of the context in which the intervention is delivered is essential here, as is consideration of the question of why an intervention works (or does not work). Detailed recommendations exist for the planning and implementation of effectiveness studies on complex interventions, to which interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy undoubtedly belongs. In an effectiveness model, concrete, verifiable assumptions are formulated as to how an intervention produces changes that are reflected in the endpoint. This article provides a brief introduction to methodological approaches to effectiveness research on complex interventions and uses the PAIN 2.0 project (01NVF20023) to describe in concrete terms what an effectiveness model for interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy for the prevention of chronic pain in an outpatient setting might look like.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementCombined Modality TherapyCooperative BehaviorGermanyHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationPain MeasurementPatient Care TeamRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSecondary PreventionComplex interventionInterdisciplinary pain management programProgram theorySecondary prevention of chronic painTheory of action

Identifiers

PMID39836198
PMCPMC12701007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.