Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39836033›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational gastroenterology2025

Clinical Trial: Precise Administration of Sucralfate Powder in Prevention of Delayed Postpolypectomy Bleeding. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hsueh-Chien Chiang, Po-Jun Chen, Er-Hsiang Yang, Tzu-Ling Kuo, Ming-Tsung Hsieh, Jui-Wen Kang, Hsiu-Chi Cheng, Wei-Lun Chang, Wei-Ying Chen, Hung-Chih Chiu and 10 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05817656 phase1unknown statusnot on this map

Precise Administration of Sucralfate Powder in Prevention of Delayed Polypectomy Bleeding: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled160ConditionsBleedingArmsSucralfate
NCT07257926 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this map

Prevention of Delayed Post-polypectomy Bleeding by Endoscopic Sucralfate Spray in High-risk Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled160ConditionsBleeding After GI EndoscopyArmsSucralfate, Clip
NCT07540026 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Endoscopic Application of Tranexamic Acid and Sucralfate in Gastrointestinal Tumor Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsBleeding After GI EndoscopyArms3g of sucralfate powder and 1.5g of tranexamic acid powder, Standard Treatment
NCT07679139 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Endoscopic Application of Hemostatic Drug Powder in Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsBleeding After GI EndoscopyArmsTranexamic acid and sucralfate powder spray, Standard endsocopic hemostasis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Hsueh-Chien ChiangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Po-Jun ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Er-Hsiang YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Tzu-Ling KuoDepartment of Pharmacy, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ming-Tsung HsiehDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jui-Wen KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Hsiu-Chi ChengDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Wei-Lun ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Wei-Ying ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Hung-Chih ChiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Meng-Ying LinDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Tzu-Chun HongDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chien-Ming ChiangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Wei-Chih ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Kuan-Kai HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Meng-Hsuan LuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ming-Hsuan WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chiung-Yu ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Xi-Zhang LinDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chiao-Hsiung ChuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3283-9145

Funding

Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare MOHW112-TDU-B-211-144003National Cheng Kung University Hospital NCKUH-11302055National Science and Technology Council NSTC 111-2622-B-006-002National Science and Technology Council NSTC 113-2314-B-006-057-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDelayed postpolypectomy bleeding occurs in approximately 1%-2% of all patients undergoing colonoscopic polypectomy, and this rate increases to 6% in patients with large (>2 cm) colon polyps. Sucralfate can protect the mucosa and promote its healing. This study was conducted to investigate whether colonoscopic spraying of sucralfate powder on polypectomy wounds can prevent delayed postoperative bleeding.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial included patients with polyps (size ≥0.5 cm) who had undergone colonoscopic polypectomy at our hospital between May 2023 and January 2024. After polypectomy, the patients received standard treatment for immediate bleeding. Then, they were randomly allocated to either a sucralfate group (prophylactic spraying of sucralfate powder [3 g] on polypectomy wounds) or a control group. All patients were monitored for delayed bleeding within 28 days after colonoscopy.

resultsA total of 160 patients were divided into the sucralfate and control groups (80 per group). The baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. The rate of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (0% vs 6.3%, respectively; P = 0.029) and postpolypectomy overt bloody stool (2.4% vs 18.8%, respectively; P = 0.001) were lower in the sucralfate group than in the control group. The duration of freedom from delayed bleeding was longer in the sucralfate group than in the control group ( P = 0.024). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed the additional sucralfate spray as an independent factor against postpolypectomy overt bloody stool (relative risk, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.003-0.43; P = 0.009). DISCUSSION: Colonoscopic spraying of sucralfate powder is a safe approach with potential to reduce the risk of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding. Trial registration: NCT05817656.

Indexed as

Anti-Ulcer AgentsColonic PolypsColonoscopyPostoperative HemorrhageSucralfateAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPowdersTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Ulcer AgentsPowdersSucralfatecolon polypdelayed postpolypectomy bleedingendoscopic powder spraysucralfate

Identifiers

PMID39836033
PMCPMC12020694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.