ArticleEcology2025
Sexual dimorphic effects of a keystone predator on prey communities.
Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of trait variation has long been recognized in ecological and evolutionary research. The divergence of sexually dimorphic traits (e.g., body size, morphology, behavior, etc.) is primarily attributed to sexual selection, and sexual dimorphism can have consequences for diets and habitat use. Recent evidence for one aquatic predator species (adult newts; Notophthalmus viridescens) suggests that trait differences and habitat partitioning between the sexes may be important in structuring zooplankton communities. However, newts are known to increase amphibian diversity within pond communities via keystone predation. Yet, no data are available on differentiating potentially sexually dimorphic effects of newts on larval amphibian communities. Thus, we conducted a series of mesocosm experiments to determine the effects of sexual dimorphism of adult newts on larval amphibian communities. Based on previous work with newts and zooplankton, we hypothesized that male and female newts would have differing effects on prey communities. We found that female newts consumed one prey species more than male newts did and no newt treatments. There were no differences between the sexes in prey consumption of another prey species. Size at metamorphosis was greater in the presence of newts (either male or female) for wood frogs and in the presence of female newts for spotted salamanders in comparison with no newt treatments. Our findings indicate that sexual dimorphism within a known keystone predator can have differential effects on prey. Indeed, our results indicate that while the effects of predators on one response (survival) can differ between sexes, the impacts on another response (prey fitness; measured as size at metamorphosis) were similar. Our research to understand the effects of sexual dimorphism is timely as sex ratios of predators may become skewed in nature due to anthropogenic change. If intraspecific differences exist via top-down effects, then downstream impacts on prey communities may go unnoticed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.