ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Advancing forecasting capabilities: A contrastive learning model for forecasting tropical cyclone rapid intensification.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-horizon prediction of tropical cyclone intensity and its interpretability with temporal fusion transformer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tropical cyclones (TCs), particularly those that rapidly intensify (RI), pose a significant threat due to the uncertainty in forecasting them. RI TC periods, which intensify by at least 13 m/s within 24 h, remain challenging to forecast accurately. Existing models achieve a probability of detection (POD) of 82.6% and a false alarm rate (FARate) of 27.2%. To address this, we developed a contrastive-based RI TC forecasting (RITCF-contrastive) model, utilizing satellite infrared imagery alongside atmospheric and oceanic data. The RITCF-contrastive model was tested on 1,149 TC periods in the Northwest Pacific from 2020 to 2021, achieving a POD of 92.3% and a FARate of 8.9%. RITCF-contrastive improves on previous models by addressing sample imbalance and incorporating TC structural features, leading to a 11.7% improvement in POD and a 3 times reduction in FARate compared to existing deep learning methods. The RITCF-contrastive model not only enhances RI TC forecasting but also offers a unique approach to forecasting these dangerous weather events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.