ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Machine Learning in Optimising Nursing Care Delivery Models: An Empirical Analysis of Hospital Wards.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to assess the performance of machine learning (ML) techniques in optimising nurse staffing and evaluating the appropriateness of nursing care delivery models in hospital wards. The primary outcome measures include the adequacy of nurse staffing and the appropriateness of the nursing care delivery system.
backgroundHistorical and current healthcare challenges, such as nurse shortages and increasing patient acuity, necessitate innovative approaches to nursing care delivery. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for flexible and scalable staffing models to manage surges in patient volume and acuity. MATERIALS AND
methodsA descriptive study was conducted in 39 inpatient wards across a university hospital and three state hospitals, involving 117 ward-level observations. Data were collected using the Rush Medicus Patient Classification Scale and analysed using k-Nearest Neighbour, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression algorithms. Effectiveness was measured by the accuracy of machine learning predictions regarding nurse staffing adequacy, while suitability was determined by the congruence between observed nursing care models and patient needs. REPORTING
methodSTROBE checklist.
resultsThe Random Forest algorithm demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting both nurse staffing adequacy and the appropriateness of nursing care delivery systems. The study found that 68.4% of wards had sufficient nurse staffing and 26.5% of wards used appropriate care delivery models, with functional nursing and total patient care models being the most commonly used. DISCUSSION: The study highlights functional nursing and total patient care models, emphasising the need to consider nurse qualifications and patient needs in selecting care systems. Machine learning, particularly the Random Forest algorithm, proved effective in aligning staffing with patient requirements.
conclusionMachine learning, particularly the Random Forest algorithm, proves effective in optimising nursing care delivery models, suggesting significant potential for enhancing patient care and nurse satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS: The research underscores machine learning's role in improving nursing care delivery, aligning nurse staffing with patient needs, and advancing healthcare outcomes. IMPACT: The findings advocate for integrating machine learning in the planning of nursing care delivery models. This study sets a precedent for using data-driven approaches to improve nurse staffing and care delivery, potentially enhancing global clinical outcomes and operational efficiencies. The global clinical community can learn from this study the value of employing machine learning techniques to make informed, evidence-based decisions in healthcare management. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: While the study lacked direct patient involvement, its goal was to enhance patient care and healthcare efficiency. Future research will aim to incorporate patient and public insights more directly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.