ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Value of Systematic and MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy in Different Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent approach to clinically suspicious biopsy-naïve men consists performing prostate MRI, followed by combined systematic (TRUS-Bx) and MRI-Ultrasound fusion biopsy (MRI-TBx) in those with PIRADS score ≥ 3. Researchers have attempted to determine who benefits from each biopsy method, but the results do not support the safe use of one method alone. This study aims to determine the optimal approach in biopsy-naïve men, according to their PSA levels. METHODS AND
resultsA retrospective chart review of clinically suspicious biopsy-naïve men who underwent both TRUS-Bx and MRI-TBx was done. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels were compared between patients only positive for MRI-TBx and those with positive TRUS-Bx. Further, cancer cases were divided to < 10 and ≥ 10 PSA groups and the pathology results, obtained by each method, were compared. Out of 195 men, 36 were diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa). PCa was diagnosed by both MRI-TBx and TRUS-Bx in 26 men, half of whom had PSA > 10 ng/mL. At PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL, PCa would have been missed in 4 men (11.1%) had MRI-TBx not been done, and in 6 men (16.6%) had TRUS-Bx not been done.
conclusionDespite attempts to perform only one biopsy method in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer, we propose that at least in men with PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL, both systematic and MRI-targeted biopsies be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.