ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
Assessing Pulmonary Embolisms on Unenhanced CT Images Using Electron Density Images Derived from Dual-Layer Spectral Detector CT: A Single-centre Prospective Study Conducted at the Emergency Department
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple spectral images can be extrapolated from Spectral Detector CT (SDCT), ED, and OED images. ED and OED images are highly sensitive to moisture-rich tissues. Moreover, they have the potential to detect pulmonary artery thrombi in non-enhanced chest CT images. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ED and OED images obtained using SDCT for the detection of pulmonary embolism on non-enhanced images. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of unenhanced spectral imaging, Electron Density (ED), and Overlay Electron Density (OED) images for assessing pulmonary embolisms in patients with suspected or confirmed Acute Pulmonary Embolism (APE). Methods: Seventy-nine patients who underwent unenhanced and Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) using dual-layer spectral detector CT to evaluate APE between November, 2021 and April, 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Based on unenhanced spectral and CTPA images, two radiologists identified areas of high density in the main, lobar, and segmental pulmonary arteries on ED and OED images and detected Pulmonary Embolism (PE) on enhanced images using a consultative approach. CTPA results were considered the gold standard. The diagnostic performance of ED and OED in detecting PE was analyzed. Results: PE was detected in 40 patients (40/79), and 17, 69, and 20 PEs were detected in the main, lobar, and segmental arteries, respectively. The PE detection sensitivity on ED images was 69.7–94.7%, and the specificity was 58.5–98.2% for the individual, main, lobe, and segmental pulmonary arteries. The sensitivity and specificity for OED images were 94.1–95.2% and 80.0–98.1%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 53.6–87.7% and 69.7–95.9% for ED images and 48.5–88.9% and 94.1–98.9% for OED images, respectively. The accuracy was 76.0–98.9% and 87.3–96.2% when using ED and OED images, respectively. The research identified that whether it was main, lobar, or segmental pulmonary arteries with blood clots, EDW values ranged from 108.1–108.8%EDW, which were 3.9–4.2%EDW higher than those of arteries without emboli. Pulmonary arteries with emboli standardised ED values were 103.6-104.3%EDW. Conclusion: ED and OED images using spectral CT without contrast media demonstrated high diagnostic performance and could improve the visualization of PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.