Trial reportJournal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences2025
Capnographic monitoring using a novel mainstream system during endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capnographic monitoring using a novel mainstream system during endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A prospective randomized controlled trial.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2025Trial
- Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: From Drug-Centered Protocols to Personalized, Technology-Supported Pathways: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A Rare but Life-Threatening Complication of Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy: Tension Pneumoperitoneum With Pneumothorax and Hypercapnia due to Walled-Off Necrosis Rupture.Case reports in gastrointestinal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeInsufficient studies exist on capnography efficacy during endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and no definitive conclusions have been drawn. To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a novel mainstream capnography using an over-the-biteblock end-tidal CO
methodsPatients undergoing EUS or ERCP with conscious sedation at a single Japanese center were randomized to a control or a novel capnography monitored (intervention) group in a 1:1 ratio. Hypoxemia correction maneuvers were pursued if the oxygen saturation decreased to <92% in the control or intervention group and if a 15-s suspension of EtCO
resultsIn total, 250 patients were enrolled without dropouts or missing data (control group: 125; capnography group: 125). There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypoxemia between the control and capnography groups (29.6% [37/125] vs. 26.4% [33/125]; p = .573). The estimated odds ratio was 0.925 (95% confidence interval: 0.708-1.208). The EtCO
conclusionsAlthough the novel mainstream capnography with an over-the-biteblock EtCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.