ArticlePain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2025
A comparison of MRI and intraoperative measurements to determine interspinous spacer device size.
Article in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of the Use of Interspinous Spacers in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Mapping Gap and Scoping Review.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026Article
- A comparison of MRI and intraoperative measurements to determine interspinous spacer device size.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can reliably determine intraoperative measurements in the Vertiflex Interspinous Spacer (ISS) procedure.
methodsPatients who underwent Vertiflex ISS with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) and a preoperative MRI available in picture archiving and communication system (PACS) between January 2013 to February 2023 were identified retrospectively from the University of Chicago Medical Center Database. An experienced board-certified pain specialist and well-trained 2nd-year medical student independently performed measurements of the interspinous space where Vertiflex ISSs of various sizes are inserted. MRI measurements were taken blinded to intraoperative measurement and ISS implant size used in the procedure. Pearson's correlation, paired T-test, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), absolute agreement, and 2-way random effects model were used to determine the relationships between MRI, intraoperative measurement, and ISS size.
resultsA total of 79 patients who underwent the Vertiflex ISS procedure were included in the study. Median Vertiflex ISS size was 10 mm (10-12), mean intraoperative measurement was 11.40 mm (±1.23), and mean MRI measurement was 11.24 mm (±1.44). Mean differences were not significant in intraoperative and MRI measurements (p = 0.271). Pearson's correlation between ISS size and intraoperative measurement was 0.807 (p < 0.001), representing the current best practice model. Pearson's correlation was 0.668 (p < 0.001) between MRI measurement and ISS size and 0.542 (p < 0.001) between MRI and intraoperative measurement. ICC showed good agreement and moderate reliability (0.698) between intraoperative and MRI measurements. Observer interrater ICC agreement of the MRI interspinous space measurement was 0.95 (p < 0.001).
conclusionsMeasuring interspinous space on MRI yielded, on average, a value smaller than the intraoperative measurement in Vertiflex ISS procedures, but the mean differences were not significant. Good agreement and moderate reliability were found between observer MRI and surgeon intraoperative measurements, suggesting MRI can evaluate the intraoperative space for the Vertiflex ISS procedure. Preoperative MRI measurement may help decrease complications by aiding in surgical decision-making through providing a reference for intraoperative measurements. Further prospective study is necessary to determine if preoperative MRI measurement can predict and potentially replace the need for intraoperative measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.