ReviewJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2025
Plastics in dermatology: A review and solutions.
Review in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Presentation Is Incomplete.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Article
- Sustainability in Cosmetic Dermatology: Moving Toward an Ecologically Responsible Future.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Plastics in dermatology: A review and solutions.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Review
- Environmental Impact of Dermatology and Action Towards It: A Narrative Review.International journal of dermatology · 2025Review
- How to make dermatology conferences more sustainable?Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hazards to human and planetary health are present at every stage of the plastic life cycle, yet plastic production is projected to triple by 2060. This review focuses on three key areas: the life cycle of plastic, the impact of microplastics and their associated chemicals, along with recommendations to reduce plastic use. In dermatology, micro- and nanoplastics are especially problematic as they are present in over 90% of personal care products. They have been detected in utero, absorbed through the skin and found in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract. Numerous in vitro and animal studies have substantiated the negative impact of micro- and nanoplastics but gaps remain with regards to their effect on human health. In spite of this limitation, we review the evidence to date and offer evidence-based recommendations which can reduce plastic production, enhance health outcomes and promote environmental justice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.