Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39835292›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2024

Nerve repair with polylactic acid and inosine treatment enhance regeneration and improve functional recovery after sciatic nerve transection.

Fellipe Soares Dos Santos Cardoso, Guilherme Dos Santos Maria, Fernanda Marques Pestana, Ricardo Cardoso, Bruna Dos Santos Ramalho, Luiza Dos Santos Heringer, Tiago Bastos Taboada, Ana Maria Blanco Martinez, Fernanda Martins de Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fellipe Soares Dos Santos CardosoLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo - Departamento de Anatomia Patológica, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, HUCFF/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Guilherme Dos Santos MariaLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo - Departamento de Anatomia Patológica, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, HUCFF/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fernanda Marques PestanaLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo - Departamento de Anatomia Patológica, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, HUCFF/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ricardo CardosoFaculdade Souza Marques, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruna Dos Santos RamalhoLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo - Departamento de Anatomia Patológica, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, HUCFF/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luiza Dos Santos HeringerLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo - Departamento de Anatomia Patológica, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, HUCFF/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Tiago Bastos TaboadaLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo - Departamento de Anatomia Patológica, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, HUCFF/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ana Maria Blanco MartinezLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo - Departamento de Anatomia Patológica, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, HUCFF/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fernanda Martins de AlmeidaLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo - Departamento de Anatomia Patológica, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, HUCFF/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Following transection, nerve repair using the polylactic acid (PLA) conduit is an effective option. In addition, inosine treatment has shown potential to promote nerve regeneration. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the regenerative potential of inosine after nerve transection and polylactic acid conduit repair. Methods: C57/Black6 mice were subjected to sciatic nerve transection, repair with PLA conduit, and intraperitoneal injection of saline or inosine 1 h after injury and daily for 1 week. To assess motor and sensory recovery, functional tests were performed before and weekly up to 8 weeks after injury. Following, to evaluate the promotion of regeneration and myelination, electroneuromyography, morphometric analysis and immunohistochemistry were then performed. Results: Our results showed that the inosine group had a greater number of myelinated nerve fibers (1,293 ± 85.49 vs. 817 ± 89.2), an increase in neurofilament high chain (NFH) and myelin basic protein (MBP) immunolabeling and a greater number of fibers within the ideal g-ratio (453.8 ± 45.24 vs. 336.6 ± 37.01). In addition, the inosine group presented a greater adenosine A2 receptor (A2AR) immunolabeling area. This resulted in greater compound muscle action potential amplitude and nerve conduction velocity, leading to preservation of muscle and neuromuscular junction integrity, and consequently, the recovery of motor and sensory function. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that inosine may enhance regeneration and improve both motor and sensory function recovery after nerve transection when repaired with a poly-lactic acid conduit. This advances the understanding of biomaterials and molecular treatments.

Indexed as

A2A receptorinosinenerve regenerationnerve repairsciatic nerve transection

Identifiers

PMID39835292
PMCPMC11743644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.