Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39835228›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB2025

Sample Preparation of Adherent Cell Lines for Flow Cytometry: Protocol Optimization-Our Experience with SW-480 colorectal cancer cell line.

Nikola Radenković, Milena Milutinović, Danijela Nikodijević, Jovana Jovankić, Vladimir Jurišić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikola RadenkovićFaculty of Science, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Kragujevac, Radoja Domanovića 12, Kragujevac, 34000 Serbia.
Milena MilutinovićFaculty of Science, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Kragujevac, Radoja Domanovića 12, Kragujevac, 34000 Serbia.
Danijela NikodijevićFaculty of Science, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Kragujevac, Radoja Domanovića 12, Kragujevac, 34000 Serbia.
Jovana JovankićFaculty of Science, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Kragujevac, Radoja Domanovića 12, Kragujevac, 34000 Serbia.
Vladimir JurišićFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Svetozara Markovica 69, Kragujevac, 34000 Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-6525-128X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common method for detection of apoptosis is flow cytometry. In previously published studies there are some uncertainties and problems about the preparation of adherent cell lines for analysis. Thus, the aim of this study is to determine and describe how preparing the sample of SW-480 cells in two different ways affects the reliability of the results. In Protocol 1 the total cell number, cells in flow media and cells which adhere, were used, while in Protocol 2 the medium was removed after cell incubation and only the adherent cells were used. Results show statistically significant changes in percentages of different cell types (viable, apoptosis, and necrosis) between two different protocols. Protocol 2, where the first medium with dead cells were removed and only the cells that were attached to the bottom were used for analysis, give better cell viability in the control sample. Removing the medium is especially recommended for long-term treatments, where the cells consume nutrients and, due to lack, initiate apoptosis. After 72 h, spontaneous apoptosis is detectable in control cells and indicates low viability of the control sample, while in treated cells by proapoptotic substances, together with induced apoptosis leads to cumulative or synergistic effects.

Indexed as

Annexin VDetection of apoptosisFlow cytometryPropidium iodideProtocol

Identifiers

PMID39835228
PMCPMC11741975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.