ReviewFrontiers in physiology2024
Pulmonary function in swimmers exposed to disinfection by-products: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Monitoring Lung Function of Asthmatic Swimmers in Public Swimming Pools.Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Swimming produces many psychophysiological effects, including blood, hormonal, enzymatic, pulmonary, cardiovascular and energetic adaptations. However, asthma and allergies are becoming increasingly prevalent medical issues among elite endurance-trained swimmers, where exercise-induced asthma or bronchospasm is frequently reported. Heavy endurance swimming training, especially under adverse conditions, stresses the airway mucosa, leading to inflammatory changes, as observed in induced sputum in competitive swimmers. In addition, chlorine-based disinfectants (CBDs) are commonly used in indoor pools due to their effectiveness and lower relative cost. Many of these substances have carcinogenic and genotoxic properties, and exposure to DBPs have been linked to adverse respiratory effects. The association between long-term exposure to a chlorinated swimming pool and elevated serum sIgE levels suggests a link between allergens, chlorine exposure and the development of various pulmonary dysfunctions. Thus, the combination of intense and repeated physical endurance training over extended periods, along with suboptimal environmental conditions, may contribute to the development of rhinitis, asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in athletes. While occasional or low-level exposure to chlorine might not be harmful, regular swimmers, especially those at competitive levels, are at a higher risk of developing respiratory disorders. Because these potential risks of exposure to CBDs must be balanced against the benefits of swimming and the risk of microbial infections in pools, we recommend better pool management and regular health checks for swimmers. Fortunately, the reduction of bronchial symptoms in swimmers who reduce training volume and intensity suggests that the negative effects on pulmonary function may be reversible. For these reasons, it is crucial to develop effective respiratory protection strategies, including medical interventions and modifications to the pool environment. Practical steps such as reducing chlorine use, ensuring proper hygiene before swimming and using swim caps can minimise risks. Research should also explore safer alternatives to CBDs, such as ozonation, and improved ventilation to reduce air pollutants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.