ArticleIJID regions2025
Comparison of the Abbott Alinity m and Qiagen Artus assays for the quantification of BK virus in clinical samples.
Article in IJID regions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: BK virus (BKV) is highly seroprevalent in humans. After primary infection, it remains latent in the urinary tract and can reactivate in immunocompromised individuals, leading to interstitial nephropathy or hemorrhagic cystitis. The BKV viral load (VL) in plasma correlates with the occurrence of nephropathy and can be monitored in kidney graft recipients; the early detection of BKV viremia can enable an early reduction of immunosuppressant drug doses and the prevention of BKV-associated nephropathy. BKV VL is measured using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Our aim was to evaluate the Abbott Alinity m BKV AMPL kit versus the Artus BKV quantification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Methods: We compared the methods on 69 plasma samples, 54 urine samples, and 12 external quality control samples. To assess analytical sensitivity, serial dilutions of internal control were also tested. Results: Specificity reached 100%. Fifty-seven of the 59 plasma samples were found to be positive (sensitivity: 96.6%), as were 46 of the 48 urine samples (sensitivity: 95.8%). In quantifiable samples, the VL was correlated with the findings on plasma (r = 0.965) and urine samples (r = 0.971). The mean differences were 0.78 log Conclusions: The Alinity m BKV AMPL kit is compatible with diagnostic use and can be used in a "random-access" manner, thus reducing the time between sampling and the results being available to clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.