ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Uterine Measurements and Endometrial Thickness Among Healthy Saudi Females Sample.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uterine morphology in normogonadotropic anovulation: a comparative study of polycystic ovary syndrome and hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian dysfunction.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- ImageJ Analysis for Transabdominal Endometrial Sonography of Single Saudi Females: A Cohort Study.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The present study was conducted to analyze uterine measurements and endometrial thickness throughout the menstrual cycle in Saudi healthy females of reproductive age. Methods: This cohort study was conducted at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Saudi Arabia, among thirty-three females of reproductive age who underwent trans-abdominal pelvic ultrasound scans across four menstrual cycle phases. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26, utilizing descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, correlation, and regression analysis. Results: Endometrial thickness and layers showed significant variations (p<0.001) across menstrual phases (early proliferative: 0.59 ± 0.21 cm, late proliferative: 0.77 ± 0.24 cm, secretory: 1.09 ± 0.40 cm, menstrual: 0.52 ± 0.35 cm). Endometrial thickness was positively correlated with number of layers (r=0.576, p<0.05). The study showed that the average uterine length, width, and thickness were 7.33 ± 0.76 cm, 3.93 ± 1.00 cm and 3.44 ± 0.55 cm, which showed stability across menstrual phases, except for width showing slight variations. Endometrial thickness was positively correlated with uterine thickness (r=0.358, p<0.05). Conclusion: The study results emphasize the significance of using region-specific reference values in clinical practice. This approach would enable precise evaluation and treatment of gynecological problems. It is encouraged to do future study with larger populations in order to validate these results and improve the therapeutic applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.