ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Predicting the risk of gastroparesis in critically ill patients after CME using an interpretable machine learning algorithm - a 10-year multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Motility Diagnostics: A Systematic Review.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastroparesis following complete mesocolic excision (CME) can precipitate a cascade of severe complications, which may significantly hinder postoperative recovery and diminish the patient's quality of life. In the present study, four advanced machine learning algorithms-Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Methods: We gathered 34 feature variables from a cohort of 1,097 colon cancer patients, including 87 individuals who developed gastroparesis post-surgery, across multiple hospitals, and applied a range of machine learning algorithms to construct the predictive model. To assess the model's generalization performance, we employed 10-fold cross-validation, while the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to evaluate its discriminative capacity. Additionally, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and external validation were integrated to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the model's clinical applicability and utility. Results: Among the four predictive models, the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated superior performance. As indicated by the ROC curve, XGBoost achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.939 in the training set and 0.876 in the validation set, reflecting exceptional predictive accuracy. Notably, in the Conclusion: The onset of postoperative gastroparesis in colon cancer patients remains an elusive challenge to entirely prevent. However, the prediction model developed in this study offers valuable assistance to clinicians in identifying key high-risk factors for gastroparesis, thereby enhancing the quality of life and survival outcomes for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.