Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39835111›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Improving students' performance via case-based e-learning.

Sebastian Ertl, Patricia P Wadowski, Henriette Löffler-Stastka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sebastian ErtlDepartment of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Patricia P WadowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Angiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Henriette Löffler-StastkaDepartment of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The integration of interdisciplinary clinical reasoning and decision-making into the medical curriculum is imperative. Novel, high-quality e-learning environments, encompassing virtual clinical and hands-on training, are essential. Consequently, we evaluated the efficacy of a case-based e-learning approach. Method: The impact of a case-based interdisciplinary e-learning environment with an integrated question/feedback system on medical students' academic performance was examined in a cross-sectional sample of different study years, longitudinally matched per academic year. Differences between the groups were analyzed through an unpaired Results: The exam results of students who participated in the e-learning course ( Conclusions: Our analyses demonstrated the positive influence of a case-based e-learning approach within the Viennese medical curriculum.

Indexed as

case-based blended learningcomputer-assisted instructiondistance learning competencee-learningtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39835111
PMCPMC11743159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.