Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39835102›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Comparison between traditional logistic regression and machine learning for predicting mortality in adult sepsis patients.

Hongsheng Wu, Biling Liao, Tengfei Ji, Keqiang Ma, Yumei Luo, Shengmin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hongsheng WuHepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery Department, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.
Biling LiaoHepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery Department, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.
Tengfei JiHepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery Department, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.
Keqiang MaHepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery Department, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.
Yumei LuoHepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery Department, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.
Shengmin ZhangHepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery Department, Huadu District People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening disease associated with a high mortality rate, emphasizing the need for the exploration of novel models to predict the prognosis of this patient population. This study compared the performance of traditional logistic regression and machine learning models in predicting adult sepsis mortality. Objective: To develop an optimum model for predicting the mortality of adult sepsis patients based on comparing traditional logistic regression and machine learning methodology. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 606 adult sepsis inpatients at our medical center between January 2020 and December 2022, who were randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Traditional logistic regression and machine learning methods were employed to assess the predictive ability of mortality in adult sepsis. Univariate analysis identified independent risk factors for the logistic regression model, while Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression facilitated variable shrinkage and selection for the machine learning model. Among various machine learning models, which included Bagged Tree, Results: Univariate analysis was employed to assess 17 variables, namely gender, history of coronary heart disease (CHD), systolic pressure, white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil count (NEUT), lymphocyte count (LYMP), lactic acid, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), red blood cell distribution width (RDW), interleukin-6 (IL-6), prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), fibrinogen (FBI), D-dimer, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (Tbil), and lung infection. Significant differences ( Conclusion: Based on deep machine learning principles, the RF model demonstrates advantages over traditional logistic regression models in predicting adult sepsis prognosis. The RF model holds significant potential for clinical surveillance and interventions to enhance outcomes for sepsis patients.

Indexed as

adult sepsislogistic regressionmachine learningmortalityrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID39835102
PMCPMC11743956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.