Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39835096›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2024

Harnessing artificial intelligence in sepsis care: advances in early detection, personalized treatment, and real-time monitoring.

Fang Li, Shengguo Wang, Zhi Gao, Maofeng Qing, Shan Pan, Yingying Liu, Chengchen Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hour-1 Sepsis Bundle: Updated Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fang LiDepartment of General Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Shengguo WangDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhi GaoDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Maofeng QingDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shan PanDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yingying LiuDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chengchen HuDepartment of Stomatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide due to its rapid progression and heterogeneous nature. This review explores the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to transform sepsis management, from early detection to personalized treatment and real-time monitoring. AI, particularly through machine learning (ML) techniques such as random forest models and deep learning algorithms, has shown promise in analyzing electronic health record (EHR) data to identify patterns that enable early sepsis detection. For instance, random forest models have demonstrated high accuracy in predicting sepsis onset in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, while deep learning approaches have been applied to recognize complications such as sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Personalized treatment plans developed through AI algorithms predict patient-specific responses to therapies, optimizing therapeutic efficacy and minimizing adverse effects. AI-driven continuous monitoring systems, including wearable devices, provide real-time predictions of sepsis-related complications, enabling timely interventions. Beyond these advancements, AI enhances diagnostic accuracy, predicts long-term outcomes, and supports dynamic risk assessment in clinical settings. However, ethical challenges, including data privacy concerns and algorithmic biases, must be addressed to ensure fair and effective implementation. The significance of this review lies in addressing the current limitations in sepsis management and highlighting how AI can overcome these hurdles. By leveraging AI, healthcare providers can significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy, optimize treatment protocols, and improve overall patient outcomes. Future research should focus on refining AI algorithms with diverse datasets, integrating emerging technologies, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to address these challenges and realize AI's transformative potential in sepsis care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceearly detectionpersonalized treatmentreal-time monitoringsepsis management

Identifiers

PMID39835096
PMCPMC11743359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.