ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Individualized treatment recommendations for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma utilizing deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized Treatment Recommendation System in Head and Neck Cancer Using Survival Analysis and Deep Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Why health recommender systems struggle to reach clinical practice: A lifecycle-oriented systematic review.iScience · 2026Article
- From Semantic Modeling to Precision Radiotherapy: An AI Framework Linking Radiobiology, Oncology, and Public Health Integration.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The conventional treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) is surgery; however, the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains controversial. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the ability of deep learning (DL) models to identify patients with LA-HNSCC who can achieve organ preservation through definitive CRT and provide individualized adjuvant treatment recommendations for patients who are better suited for surgery. Methods: Five models were developed for treatment recommendations. Their performance was assessed by comparing the difference in overall survival rates between patients whose actual treatments aligned with the model recommendations and those whose treatments did not. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to reduce bias. The effect of the characteristics on treatment plan selection was quantified through causal inference. Results: A total of 7,376 patients with LA-HNSCC were enrolled. Balanced Individual Treatment Effect for Survival data (BITES) demonstrated superior performance in both the CRT recommendation (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.98) and the adjuvant therapy recommendation (IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.77, 95% CI, 0.61-0.85), outperforming other models and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.87, 95% CI, 0.73-0.96). Conclusion: BITES can identify the most suitable treatment option for an individual patient from the three most common treatment options. DL models facilitate the establishment of a valid and reliable treatment recommendation system supported by quantitative evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.