Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39835092›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Individualized treatment recommendations for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma utilizing deep learning.

Linmei Zhang, Enzhao Zhu, Jiaying Shi, Xiao Wu, Shaokang Cao, Sining Huang, Zisheng Ai, Jiansheng Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linmei Zhang *Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration, Tongji Research Institute of Stomatology, Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Tongji Stomatological Hospital, Dental School, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Enzhao Zhu *School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jiaying ShiShanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration, Tongji Research Institute of Stomatology, Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Tongji Stomatological Hospital, Dental School, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao WuShanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration, Tongji Research Institute of Stomatology, Department of Periodontics, Shanghai Tongji Stomatological Hospital, Dental School, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shaokang CaoShanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration, Tongji Research Institute of Stomatology, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Tongji Stomatological Hospital, Dental School, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Sining HuangShanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration, Tongji Research Institute of Stomatology, Department of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Tongji Stomatological Hospital, Dental School, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Zisheng Ai *Department of Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jiansheng Su *Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration, Tongji Research Institute of Stomatology, Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Tongji Stomatological Hospital, Dental School, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The conventional treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) is surgery; however, the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains controversial. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the ability of deep learning (DL) models to identify patients with LA-HNSCC who can achieve organ preservation through definitive CRT and provide individualized adjuvant treatment recommendations for patients who are better suited for surgery. Methods: Five models were developed for treatment recommendations. Their performance was assessed by comparing the difference in overall survival rates between patients whose actual treatments aligned with the model recommendations and those whose treatments did not. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to reduce bias. The effect of the characteristics on treatment plan selection was quantified through causal inference. Results: A total of 7,376 patients with LA-HNSCC were enrolled. Balanced Individual Treatment Effect for Survival data (BITES) demonstrated superior performance in both the CRT recommendation (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.98) and the adjuvant therapy recommendation (IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.77, 95% CI, 0.61-0.85), outperforming other models and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.87, 95% CI, 0.73-0.96). Conclusion: BITES can identify the most suitable treatment option for an individual patient from the three most common treatment options. DL models facilitate the establishment of a valid and reliable treatment recommendation system supported by quantitative evidence.

Indexed as

causal inferencechemoradiotherapydeep learninghead and neck squamous cell carcinomaprecise medicine

Identifiers

PMID39835092
PMCPMC11744519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.