Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39835034›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Bio-Obturation for Internal Root Resorption in Contralateral Mandibular Molars: A Five-Year Case Study.

Saeed Asgary

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Narrative Review of Endodontic Biomaterials.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saeed AsgaryEndodontics, Iranian Center for Endodontic Research, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internal root resorption (IRR) is a rare but complex condition characterized by progressive destruction of the internal dentin walls, typically resulting from chronic pulp inflammation, trauma, or infection. Managing apical IRR, particularly in teeth with extensive apical lesions, presents significant challenges due to the limitations of traditional root canal treatment (RCT) and obturation techniques. This report discusses the nonsurgical management of two contralateral mandibular first molars in a 49-year-old male patient, both exhibiting apical IRR and large endodontic lesions. Despite the previous RCT, the teeth continued to show clinical symptoms and radiographic evidence of persistent apical lesions and resorptive defects. The patient elected nonsurgical retreatment with bio-obturation using endodontic biomaterials. After cleaning, disinfecting, and preparing the root canals, the teeth were obturated with a calcium-enriched mixture cement. Within one week, the patient's symptoms resolved, and a radiographic follow-up at five years revealed complete healing of the apical lesions. This case underscores the effectiveness of bio-obturation using endodontic biomaterials in treating apical IRR with large lesions, providing a nonsurgical solution that preserves natural tooth structure, promotes healing, and minimizes the risk of reinfection. Bio-obturation with endodontic biomaterials should be considered a viable treatment option for IRR, especially in cases with extensive apical lesions, and further studies are warranted to evaluate its long-term efficacy in more complex cases.

Indexed as

apical periodontitiscalcium-enriched mixturecalcium silicate cementcem cementinternal root resorptionminimally invasive dentistry

Identifiers

PMID39835034
PMCPMC11743772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.