Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39835033›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

An Eye on Efficiency: A Quality Improvement Project to Increase Ophthalmology Equipment in the Accident and Emergency Department.

Jacques le Roux, Ayushi Gupta, Jaykumaran Govender

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacques le RouxEmergency Medicine, Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Ayushi GuptaOphthalmology, Royal Free Hospital, London, GBR.
Jaykumaran GovenderEmergency Medicine, Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Ophthalmology presentations contribute significantly to Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendance. The provision of safe care depends on clinical skills and appropriate equipment. This quality improvement project aimed to increase the availability of ophthalmoscopes and Snellen charts required for a basic ophthalmological assessment in an A&E department in North London.  Methods The time taken for 23 permanent staff to retrieve a working ophthalmoscope and 9 permanent staff to find a Snellen chart, respectively, were recorded in different areas of the department. Following this, broken ophthalmoscopes were replaced, and additional ophthalmoscopes and Snellen charts were installed. The task was repeated post-intervention.  Results Pre-intervention, there was 1 ophthalmoscope per 4.9 cubicles which increased to 1 per 1.7 cubicles post-intervention. The number of ophthalmoscopes in paediatric A&E and the number of mobile ophthalmoscopes increased the most. The median time taken to find a working ophthalmoscope anywhere in the department was 53 seconds pre-intervention and 19 seconds post-intervention. The median time taken to find a Snellen chart was 90 seconds pre-intervention and 32 seconds post intervention.  Conclusions This quality improvement project successfully increased the number of ophthalmoscopes available in the department to meet local targets in most areas of A&E except for the major injuries and resuscitation areas. The time taken to find a working ophthalmoscope and Snellen chart was significantly reduced. Based on the number of patients presenting to our A&E with eye complaints over a one-year period between 01/07/23 and 01/07/24, these interventions will save approximately 13.6 clinician working hours searching for an ophthalmoscope and 15.4 clinician working hours searching for a Snellen chart.

Indexed as

emergency departmentemergency medicineophthalmology assessmentophthalmoscope usequality improvement project

Identifiers

PMID39835033
PMCPMC11743652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.