ArticleCureus2024
Anesthetic Management for Pediatric Lung Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Lung resection is a complex surgical procedure performed in children to address various pulmonary conditions. The success of this surgical intervention in these patients lies in a multidisciplinary approach, with anesthetic management playing a critical role in ensuring the safety and efficacy of the procedure. Methods After approval by the local ethics committee, clinical data of 17 pediatric patients who underwent lung resection in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Results A total of 16 patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and only one patient underwent open thoracotomy. Most indications for this type of procedure are linked to cystic disease at a stage where respiratory function is not severely compromised. Lung resection procedures were conducted under general anesthesia and invasive blood pressure monitoring in all patients. Various methods, such as double-lumen endotracheal tubes (DLTs), bronchial blockers (BBs), and specialized endobronchial devices, were employed to selectively collapse the lung undergoing resection while maintaining ventilation in the contralateral lung. A multimodal analgesia regimen, combining systemic analgesia with regional anesthesia techniques (epidural or regional trunk blocks), was employed. Conclusions Thorough preoperative preparation is critical for a desirable outcome in pediatric patients undergoing lung resection. The need for one-lung ventilation (OLV) presents challenges, especially in younger ages, where this surgery is more commonly performed. The use of BBs is often necessary, along with the likelihood of their extraluminal application. In recent years, to reduce the risks associated with thoracic epidural analgesia, regional trunk blocks have been described as a safe and effective alternative in pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.