ReviewCureus2024
Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning models for predicting postpartum convulsions using clinical indicators from PMA Ethiopia data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Rethinking Risk Prediction in Preeclampsia: From Biomarkers to Mechanistic Phenotypes and Longitudinal Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Machine Learning for Dynamic and Short-Term Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Routine Clinical Data.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Analysis of Retrospective Data From 503 Hospitalized Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes to Identify Factors Associated With Cognitive Impairment.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Preeclampsia Using First-Trimester Biomarkers.Cureus · 2025Article
- Understanding Preeclampsia: Cardiovascular Pathophysiology, Histopathological Insights and Molecular Biomarkers.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Reimagining Placental Perfusion in Preeclampsia: Integrating Doppler Ultrasound, Three-dimensional Vascular Indices, and Predictive Artificial Intelligence.Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Early prediction is the need of the hour so that interventions like aspirin prophylaxis can be started. Nowadays, machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to predict the disease and its prognosis. This review explores the methodologies, predictors, and performance of ML models for preeclampsia prediction, emphasizing their comparative advantages, challenges, and clinical applicability. We conducted a systematic search of databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus for studies published in the last 10 years using terms such as "preeclampsia", "risk factors", "machine learning", "artificial intelligence", and "deep learning". Words and phrases were selected using MeSH, a controlled vocabulary. Appropriate articles were selected using Boolean operators "OR" and "AND". The database search yielded 325 records. After removing duplicates and non-English articles, and completing a title and abstract search 55 research articles were assessed for eligibility of which 11 were included in this review. The risk of bias was found to be high in three of the studies and low in the rest. Clinicodemographic characteristics, laboratory reports, Doppler ultrasound, and some innovative ones like genotypic data and fundal images were predictors used to train ML models. More than ten different ML models were used in the 11 studies from diverse countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, China, and Korea. The area under the curve varied from 0.76 to 0.97. ML algorithms such as extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest, and neural networks consistently demonstrated superior predictive accuracy Non-interpretable or black box ML models may not find clinical application on ethical grounds. The future of preeclampsia prediction using ML lies in balancing model performance with interpretability. Human oversight remains indispensable in implementing and interpreting these models to achieve better maternal outcomes. Further research and validation across diverse populations are critical to establishing the universal applicability of these promising ML-based approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.