Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39834964›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Improving Patient Satisfaction With Inhalation Sedation: A Service Evaluation of Paediatric Patients at a Primary Care Referral Centre in the United Kingdom.

Melody Shirazi, Taneesa Javed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melody ShiraziOrthodontics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Taneesa JavedPaediatrics, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction This report explores patient satisfaction in a dental sedation service in primary care for paediatric patients. The study explores different behavioural management techniques and additional supportive aids as adjuncts to inhalation sedation to improve patient satisfaction. Aim and objective To determine patient satisfaction with pre-assessment, treatment and aftercare in inhalation sedation services in primary care. To improve patient satisfaction through the inclusion of behavioural management and additional supportive aids in routine practice. Materials and methods A retrospective service evaluation comprising 100 anonymous patient satisfaction questionnaires following treatment under inhalation sedation. The questionnaire explored satisfaction with pre-assessment, treatment and aftercare services. Routine use of various behavioural management techniques and supportive aids was introduced to improve patient and parent satisfaction. Results Results from two cycles showed a significant improvement in patient satisfaction following the implementation of supportive adjuncts for paediatric patients as part of the pre-assessment, treatment and post-operative care. Conclusion The use of pre-visit videos and other supportive aids, including scented pens, tooth pots and teddy bears wearing inhalation sedation masks, proved beneficial and significantly improved patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

nitrous oxide inhalation sedationpaediatric dentistrypatients satisfactionquestionnaireservice evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39834964
PMCPMC11743595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.