ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Outcome of critically ill patients receiving systemic chemotherapy on the intensive care unit.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Analyze the outcomes of critically ill patients who developed new-onset organ dysfunction and received systemic chemotherapy during their ICU stay. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A tertiary medical center in Germany with an Intensive Care Medicine department consists of 11 intensive care units comprising 140 beds, serving all subspecialties of adult intensive care medicine. Patients: 167 patients receiving systemic oncological treatment from January 1st, 2015 to December 31st, 2021, with a data cut-off on December 31st, 2022. Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: A total of 167 patients were included. The primary reasons for ICU admission were respiratory failure and shock/sepsis, each accounting for 34% of cases, while complications associated with oncological therapy accounted for less than 8%. The median age of hematological patients (n = 129) was 62 years (IQR 50-70), and for solid tumor patients (n = 38), it was 60 years (IQR 52-65). Predominant disease entities included lymphoma (43%) and acute myeloid leukemia (29%) among hematological patients, and lung cancer (47%) and gastrointestinal malignancies (17%) among solid tumor patients. Hematological patients had a significantly higher median Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (47 vs. 39 points; p=0.013), a higher need for invasive mechanical ventilation (59% vs. 50%; p=0.3), renal replacement therapy (54% vs. 24%; p < 0.001), and a higher 1-year mortality rate (64% vs. 53%; p=0.2) compared to solid tumor patients. The hazard ratio for 1 year survival for male sex was 2.34 (1.31-3.49), for mechanical ventilation 2.01 (1.33-3.04), for vasopressor therapy 1.98 (1.27-3.10), and for renal replacement therapy 1.51 (1.03-2.23), respectively. Conclusion: Administering intravenous chemotherapy in an ICU setting remains challenging, and the experience to establish an indication for systemic chemotherapy is still challenging. However, the study demonstrates that, after careful interdisciplinary decision-making, a substantial number of patients can benefit from it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.