ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Application of dynamic enhanced scanning with GD-EOB-DTPA MRI based on deep learning algorithm for lesion diagnosis in liver cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- All About Multiparametric MRI Evaluation in Biliary Tree Complications After Liver Transplant.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Improvements in the clinical diagnostic use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the identification of liver disorders have been made possible by gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA). Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology is in high demand. Objectives: The purpose of the study is to segment the liver using an enhanced multi-gradient deep convolution neural network (EMGDCNN) and to identify and categorize a localized liver lesion using a Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Methods: We provided the classifier images of the liver in five states (unenhanced, arterial, portal venous, equilibrium, and hepatobiliary) and labeled them with localized liver diseases (hepatocellular carcinoma, metastasis, hemangiomas, cysts, and scarring). The Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center ethics committee recruited 132 participants between August 2021 and February 2022. Fisher's exact test analyses liver lesion Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI data. Results: Our method could identify and classify liver lesions at the same time. On average, 25 false positives and 0.6 real positives were found in the test instances. The percentage of correct answers was 0.790. AUC, sensitivity, and specificity evaluate the procedure. Our technique outperforms others in extensive testing. Conclusion: EMGDCNN may identify and categorize a localized hepatic lesion in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. We found that one network can detect and classify. Radiologists need higher detection capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.