ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Drug-induced urinary retention: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using FDA and Canada vigilance databases.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- QT Prolongation, Ventricular Arrhythmia, and Cardiac Arrest Signals During Ceftriaxone Co-therapy with Individual Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Multidatabase Study.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Observational
- Management of Urinary Retention in Older Women.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Pharmacovigilance signal detection of central nervous system demyelinating diseases following human papillomavirus vaccination: data mining and signal analysis based on the VAERS database.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Evaluating seizures associated with novel antineoplastic agents during breast cancer treatment using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction Online Database.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urinary retention (UR) is a clinical condition where patients cannot fully empty their bladder. Although numerous drugs are associated with UR, comprehensive and reliable studies identifying drugs that induce UR are scarce. Methods: This study leveraged data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Canadian Vigilance Adverse Reaction (CVAR) database to explore adverse events (AEs) related to UR from 2004 to Q1 2024. The top 50 drugs were analyzed for annual reporting trends using linear regression. Disproportionality analysis using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method, with Results: From 2004 to Q1 2024, FAERS recorded 17,785,793 AEs, with 16,183 (0.09%) identified as UR cases. The median age among these cases was 65 years, with males comprising 53.4%. There were significant annual increases in UR reports associated with antineoplastic agents (0.19% per year) and antidiabetic drugs (0.09% per year), while reports linked to bronchodilators decreased (-0.53% per year). Disproportionality analysis revealed significant signals for 34 drugs (68%), with the highest RORs observed in Fesoterodine, Mirabegron, and Solifenacin. Initial signal detection identified potential new UR signals for Abiraterone, Valacyclovir, Fluoxetine, Empagliflozin, Clopidogrel, and Amlodipine, with CVAR confirming signals for Abiraterone, Fluoxetine, and Empagliflozin. The median time to onset of UR was 29 days, with over half of the cases occurring within 30 days of initiating medication. Conclusion: The study identifies a rising trend in drug-related UR reports over the past 2 decades. The validation of new signals for Abiraterone, Fluoxetine, and Empagliflozin underscores the critical need for continuous drug safety monitoring and targeted research to better understand the mechanisms behind drug-induced UR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.