ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
The effect of text and graphic cue-based action observation on the working memory performance of novice badminton players.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cortical hemodynamic responses during action observation with and without audiovisual stimuli: a randomized controlled experimental trial.Experimental brain research · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding strategic situations is essential in sports. There has been relatively little research examining the effectiveness of action observation based on visual cues in strategic situations. This study investigated whether action observation with visual cues can help performers understand the strategic aspects of complex sports by analyzing the effect of text cue-based action observation and graphic cue-based action observation on the accuracy and speed of cognitive information processing in working memory. Methods: Forty-four male and female novice badminton players participated in the experiment. They were randomly assigned to one of four groups: text cue-based action observation (TAO), graphic cue-based action observation (GAO), action observation (AO), and a control group (CON). The experimental design consisted of a pre-test, intervention, and post-test. The experiment analyzed the accuracy and response time of cognitive information processing in working memory. Results: The accuracy and response time analysis showed that the AO group significantly improved their cognitive performance accuracy and response time from pre-test to post-test compared to the control group. The TAO and GAO groups with visual cues significantly outperformed the AO and CON groups for accuracy. However, only the TAO group significantly outperformed the other groups in term of response time. The GAO group improved significantly compared to the CON group but not significantly compared to the AO. Conclusion: These results suggest that visual cues can influence the modulation of cognitive load in working memory and that TAO is a relatively more efficient perceptual-cognitive training method for novices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.