Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39834772›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Exploring the well-being of professional female musicians: a self-determination theory perspective.

Laurence Perrier, Laurence Latreille-Gagné, Florence Khoriaty, Maude Fortin, Arielle Bonneville-Roussy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laurence PerrierGroup of Research on Adulthood, the life Course, and Expertise (GRACE), Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Laurence Latreille-GagnéGroup of Research on Adulthood, the life Course, and Expertise (GRACE), Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Florence KhoriatyGroup of Research on Adulthood, the life Course, and Expertise (GRACE), Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Maude FortinGroup of Research on Adulthood, the life Course, and Expertise (GRACE), Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Arielle Bonneville-RoussyGroup of Research on Adulthood, the life Course, and Expertise (GRACE), Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the well-being of 16 professional female musicians through the lens of Self-Determination Theory, focusing on the satisfaction of their psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, as well as the unique challenges they encounter in their careers. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results and discussion: Three broad themes and 10 sub-themes emerged from the interviews. The findings demonstrate that the well-being of female musicians is closely tied to the satisfaction of their psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Conversely, when these needs are frustrated, their well-being is negatively impacted. Other themes that emerged from the interviews are intrinsic motivation and the gender specific challenges within the music industry. Conclusion: The study highlights the need for supportive environments to enhance the well-being of female musicians (and performers as a whole), addressing both their psychological needs and the specific gender-related challenges they face.

Indexed as

professional musiciansqualitative interviewsself-determination theorywell-beingwomen

Identifiers

PMID39834772
PMCPMC11743668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.