Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39834750›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Prospective Trial of a Passive Diversion Device to Reduce Blood Culture Contamination.

Sami Arnaout, Shannon Stock, Julia M Clifford, Thomas C Greenough, Azalea Wedig, Michael J Mitchell, Richard T Ellison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sami ArnaoutDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9750-4393
Shannon StockDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Julia M CliffordDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Thomas C GreenoughDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4132-6977
Azalea WedigInfection Control Department, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael J MitchellDepartment of Pathology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2299-3341
Richard T EllisonDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1335-9832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Blood culture contaminants can lead to inappropriate antibiotic use, prolonged length of stay, and additional hospital costs. Several devices have been developed to reduce the risk of blood culture contamination by diverting a portion of the initial blood sample from the blood culture bottle. We assessed the effectiveness of 1 blood diversion device (BDD) in a prospective trial performed at the 2 separate emergency departments (EDs) of an academic medical center. Methods: A multiphase prospective crossover trial was performed with the BDD in use at 1 ED and standard equipment at the other ED for 10 weeks, and a second 10-week study phase was conducted with the use of the BDD and standard equipment in the EDs reversed. Contaminants were identified both by standard clinical microbiology lab criteria and by independent retrospective review by 3 infectious disease (ID) physicians. The primary analysis was performed based on intention-to-use data using the physician review of positive blood cultures. Results: A total of 5637 blood samples were obtained, with 5625 samples analyzed after 12 blood culture results were deemed inconclusive by the ID physician review. The University ED had a higher blood culture contamination rate of 2.9% compared with the Memorial ED at 1.4%. In an intention-to-use analysis, the overall contamination rates were 2.0% and 2.9% in the BDD and standard equipment periods, respectively ( Conclusions: The BDD was associated with significantly lower blood culture contamination rates at the institution's 2 EDs, with a stronger effect noted at the campus caring for higher acuity patients.

Indexed as

bacteremiablood culturesblood diversion devicecontaminantsinfection control and hospital epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID39834750
PMCPMC11745125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.