ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Lung cancer and risk of cardiovascular mortality.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor histologic subtypes and stage impact the risk of cardiovascular diseases death in lung cancer patients after chemotherapy or radiotherapy: a population-based study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Review
- ETS‑1/ETS‑2 transcription factors in CVD (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Trends in cardiovascular mortality among lung cancer patients in the United States: a retrospective study from 1999 to 2023.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Trends in the Overall Incidence and Mortality of Lung Cancer: An Extensive Longitudinal Study Utilizing the CDC WONDER Database 1999-2020.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- Risk prediction models for postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- CT-Based Pericardial Composition Change as an Imaging Biomarker for Radiation-Induced Cardiotoxicity.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the cardiovascular mortality risk among lung cancer patients compared to the general population. Methods: Using data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, we conducted a population-based cohort study including 278,418 lung cancer patients aged over 30 years between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2020 as well as the general population. Poisson regression was employed to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for cardiovascular mortality. Results: Patients exhibited a significantly higher IRR of cardiovascular mortality risk compared to the general population [IRR 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-1.77]. The risk was most pronounced in patients aged 30-79 years (IRR 2.61, 95% CI 2.55-2.66), peaking at ages 30-34 years (IRR 48.93, 95% CI 21.98-108.92). Elevated cardiovascular mortality risks were observed across all subgroups, including diseases of the heart (IRR 1.79, 95% CI 1.75-1.82), cerebrovascular diseases (IRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.45-1.59), and other cardiovascular diseases (IRR 1.78, 95% CI 1.67-1.90). The first month after diagnosis presented the highest risk for patients aged 30-79 years (IRR 12.08, 95% CI 11.49-12.70) and ≥80 years (IRR 4.03, 95% CI 3.70-4.39). Clinical characteristics significantly modified cardiovascular mortality. Conclusions: Integrating cardiovascular disease monitoring and proactive management into lung cancer treatment protocols is essential to the improvement of overall survival and quality of life for lung cancer patients, particularly those who were young or with advanced tumor stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.