Rapid Manufacturing Method of Cardiovascular Models for Experimental Flow Analysis.

Jarrett Fowler, Andrew B Robbins, Cathryn Gunawan, Andrew Jastram, Michael Moreno

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jarrett FowlerTexas A&M University Department of Biomedical Engineering, College Station, TX 77840, US.

Andrew B RobbinsUniversity of Texas at Tyler Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tyler, TX 75799, US.

Cathryn GunawanTexas A&M University Department of Biomedical Engineering, College Station, TX 77840, US.

Andrew JastramJ. Mike Walker '66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, College Station, TX 77840, US.

Michael MorenoTexas A&M University Department of Biomedical Engineering, College Station, TX 77840, US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical anatomical models constructed from medical images are valuable research tools for evaluating patient-specific clinical circumstances. For example, 3D models replicating a patient's internal anatomy in the cardiovascular system can be used to validate Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models, which can then be used to identify potential hemodynamic consequences of surgical decisions by providing insight into how blood and vascular tissue mechanics may contribute to disease progression and post-operative complications. Patient-specific models have been described in the literature; however, rapid prototyping models that achieve anatomical accuracy, optical transparency, and thin-walled compliance in a cost and time-effective approach have proven challenging. This limits their utility for modeling flows in vessels,

Indexed as

AortaBiomechanicsCardiovascularFabrication Method of Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Phantom Models for Experimental Fluid Flow AnalysisManufacturingMoldingSilicone

Identifiers

PMID39834677

DOI10.1016/j.mex.2024.103124

PMCPMC11743567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.