Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39834650›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025

Health Literacy, Label Comprehension, and Consumer Perceptions of Quasi-Drug Information Among Korean Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Youngill Ko, Heui Jae Kim, Seung-Mi Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Youngill Ko *College of Pharmacy, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea.
Heui Jae Kim *Pharmacy Department, Daehang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Mi LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-9135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Health literacy (HL) is crucial in understanding labels of healthcare products. This study aimed to evaluate HL and its impact on comprehending quasi-drug labels, assess consumer perceptions of key label elements and their perceived importance, and provide actionable recommendations for improving label design and health communication. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey of 500 Korean adults (aged 20-69) was conducted in September 2023 using proportionate stratified sampling based on the 2020 Korean Census. HL was assessed using the Korean Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-K). The survey included demographic data, quasi-drug usage patterns, comprehension of 63 quasi-drug terms, and perceptions of label elements. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the importance, agreement, and need for improvement of label elements, and statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Results: Most participants had inadequate HL (68.4%). Adequate HL is strongly associated with higher comprehension of quasi-drug terms (r = 0.783, Conclusion: Significant disparities exist in the comprehension and perceived importance of quasi-drug label elements based on HL levels among Korean adults. Findings emphasize the need for targeted strategies, such as using simplified language and visual aids, to enhance label comprehension. These interventions could improve public health outcomes by increasing understanding of quasi-drug information across diverse HL levels. Future research should focus on developing and testing these targeted interventions to bridge the identified comprehension gap.

Indexed as

communicationhealth literacyKorean adultslabel comprehensionquasi-drugs

Identifiers

PMID39834650
PMCPMC11745137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.