ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Differential regulation of apoptosis-related genes during long-term culture and differentiation of canine adipose-derived stem cells - a functional bioinformatical analysis.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Adipose to Action: Reprogramming Stem Cells for Functional Neural Progenitors for Neural Regenerative Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Stem cells derived from adipose tissue are gaining popularity in the field of regenerative medicine due to their adaptability and clinical potential. Their rapid growth, ability to differentiate, and easy extraction with minimal complications make adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) a promising option for many treatments, particularly those targeting bone-related diseases. This study analyzed gene expression in canine ADSCs subjected to long-term culture and osteogenic differentiation. Methods: ADSCs were isolated from discarded surgical waste and cultured for 14 days with and without differentiation media to assess osteogenic changes. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and bioinformatical analysis were performed to obtain comprehensive transcriptomic data. A total of 17793 genes were detected and GO enrichment analysis was performed on the differentially expressed genes to identify significantly up- and downregulated Biological Process (BP) GO terms across each comparison. Results: The upregulation of apoptosis-regulating genes and genes related to circulatory system development suggest an induction of these processes, while the downregulation of neurogenesis and gliogenesis genes points to reciprocal regulation during osteogenic differentiation of canine ADSCs. Discussion: These findings underscore the potential of ADSCs in bone regeneration and offer valuable insights for advancing tissue engineering, however further studies, including proteomic analyses, are needed to confirm these patterns and their biological significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.