Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39834526›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2024

Integrating WHO thinking healthy programme for maternal mental health into routine antenatal care in China: a randomized-controlled pilot trial.

Anum Nisar, Juan Yin, Jingjun Zhang, Wenli Qi, Jie Yu, Jiaying Li, Xiaomei Li, Atif Rahman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anum NisarDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Juan YinSchool of Nursing, Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Jingjun ZhangSchool of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Wenli QiDepartment of Obstetrics, Xi'an Aerospace General Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jie YuDepartment of Obstetrics, Xi'an Workers' Union Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jiaying LiSchool of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaomei LiSchool of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Atif RahmanDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women with perinatal depression and their children are at increased risk of poor health outcomes. Integrating evidence based non-stigmatizing interventions within existing health systems is crucial to reducing psychosocial distress during pregnancy and preventing perinatal depression. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the World Health Organization (WHO) endorsed cognitive-behavior therapy-based Thinking Healthy Programme (THP), delivered by antenatal nurses in China. Methods: A two-arm pilot randomized controlled pilot trial was conducted to assess the feasibility and of the adapted Chinese version of the Thinking Healthy Programme (THP) among various stakeholders. We recruited pregnant women between 25- and 34-weeks' gestation from two pregnancy schools within the two public sector Hospitals in Xian. Participants in the intervention group attended five face to face sessions of THP facilitated by antenatal nurses. This intervention used cognitive behavior therapy principles to offer psychoeducation, behavioral activation, problem-solving strategies, and social support. In the control group, participants received standard care, which included routine pregnancy education classes led by antenatal nurses. We assessed depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at baseline, after the intervention and 4-6 weeks post-intervention, along with evaluations of anxiety, perceived social support, and health-related quality of life. Results: Among the 737 pregnant women screened, 267 (30.26%) scored ≥5 on the PHQ-9. Out of these, 85 were eligible and consented to participate, with 42 assigned to the intervention group and 43 to the control group. Eighty participants (94.1%) completed the final assessments. Our primary findings indicated that this nurse-delivered intervention was feasible to integrate into routine antenatal care and was well-received by both the women and the delivery agents. Although the study was not designed to detect differences between the intervention and control groups, we observed positive trends towards reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms favoring the intervention arm. No serious adverse events were reported. This trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with the registration number ChiCTR1900028114. Conclusions: We conclude that this intervention, grounded in the well-established WHO Thinking Healthy Programme, is both feasible and acceptable to stakeholders. It merits a definitive randomized trial to assess its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness across various settings. Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR1900028114.

Indexed as

Chinamental healthperinatacal careperinatal depressionthinking healthy programme (THP)

Identifiers

PMID39834526
PMCPMC11743642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.