ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Prediction of Distant Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Interpretable Machine Learning: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short and Long Non-Coding RNAs in Renal Cell Carcinoma.Non-coding RNA · 2026Review
- The need for speed: using nystagmus velocity profiles and machine learning models to separate canalithiasis BPV from its mimics.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Prediction of Distant Metastasis in Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background : The traditional tool for predicting distant metastasis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still insufficient. We aimed to establish an interpretable machine learning model for predicting distant metastasis in RCC patients. Methods: We involved a population-based cohort of 121433 patients (mean age = 63 years; 63.58% men) diagnosed with RCC between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The lightGBM algorithm was used to develop prediction model and assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The LightGBM model was then externally validated in 36395 RCC patients enrolled from the SEER database between 2016 and 2018. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to provide insights into the model's outcome or prediction. Results: Of 121433 patients involved in the study cohort, 10730 (8.84%) had distant metastasis. The LightGBM model showed good performance in the internal validation set (AUC: 0.955, 95% CI: 0.951-0.959) and temporal external validation sets (0.963, 95% CI: 0.959-0.967; 0.961, 95% CI: 0.954-0.966). Performance for the prediction model was also well performed in different sub-cohort stratified by age, gender, and ethnicity. The calibration curve indicated that the predicted values are highly consistent with the actual observed values. SHAP plots demonstrated that chemotherapy was the most vital variable for prediction of distant metastasis of RCC patients. Conclusion: We developed an interpretable machine learning model that is capable of accurately predicting the risk of distant metastasis of RCC patients. The presented model could help identify high-risk patients who require additional treatment strategies and follow-up regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.