ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024
MRI to digital medicine diagnosis: integrating deep learning into clinical decision-making for lumbar degenerative diseases.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning for the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Enhancing LDD diagnosis with YOLOv9-AID: simultaneous detection of pfirrmann grading, disc herniation, HIZ, and Schmorl's nodules.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To develop an intelligent system based on artificial intelligence (AI) deep learning algorithms using deep learning tools, aiming to assist in the diagnosis of lumbar degenerative diseases by identifying lumbar spine magnetic resonance images (MRI) and improve the clinical efficiency of physicians. Methods: The PP-YOLOv2 algorithm, a deep learning technique, was used to design a deep learning program capable of automatically identifying the spinal diseases (lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spondylolisthesis) based on the lumbar spine MR images. A retrospective analysis was conducted on lumbar spine MR images of patients who visited our hospital from January 2017 to January 2022. The collected images were divided into a training set and a testing set. The training set images were used to establish and validate the deep learning program's algorithm. The testing set images were annotated, and the experimental results were recorded by three spinal specialists. The training set images were also validated using the deep learning program, and the experimental results were recorded. Finally, a comparison of the accuracy of the deep learning algorithm and that of spinal surgeons was performed to determine the clinical usability of deep learning technology based on the PP-YOLOv2 algorithm. A total of 654 patients were included in the final study, with 604 cases in the training set and 50 cases in the testing set. Results: The mean average precision (mAP) value of the deep learning algorithm reached 90.08% based on the PP-YOLOv2 algorithm. Through classification of the testing set, the deep learning algorithm showed higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing lumbar spine MR images compared to manual identification. Additionally, the testing time of the deep learning program was significantly shorter than that of manual identification, and the differences were statistically significant ( Conclusions: Deep learning technology based on the PP-YOLOv2 algorithm can be used to identify normal intervertebral discs, lumbar disc herniation, and lumbar spondylolisthesis from lumbar MRI images. Its diagnostic performance is significantly higher than that of most spinal surgeons and can be practically applied in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.