SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2024
The effect of gut microbiome-targeted therapies in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polymicrobial periodontal infection selectively alters the fecal microbiome in mice: Implications for the oral-gut microbial axis.Archives of oral biology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic landscape evolution for steatotic liver disease: from lifestyle interventions to precision pharmacotherapy.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
- The Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: From Dysbiosis to Metagenomic Insights and Therapeutic Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fecal microbiota transplantation in chronic liver disease: Current and future state of the art.Hepatology communications · 2026Review
- Reconstructing Liver Fibrosis: 3D Human Models, Microbiome Interfaces, and Therapeutic Innovation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- SR9009 regulates macrophage polarization via the NR1D1/NF-κB axis to ameliorate obesity-associated ulcerative colitis.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Targeting the gut microbiota: the application and prospects of probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and natural products in MASLD.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Association Between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and the Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota: A Cross-Sectional Study.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Complexity of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: State of the art review.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Probiotics in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis: A Comprehensive Review.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): the interplay of gut microbiome, insulin resistance, and diabetes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of NAFLD is increasing. Preclinical evidences indicate that modulation of the gut microbiome could be a promising target in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Method: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effect of probiotics, synbiotics, prebiotics, fecal microbiota transplant, and antibiotics on the liver-enzyme, metabolic effects and liver-specific in patients with NAFLD. The randomized controlled trails (RCTs), limited to English language were searched from database such as Pubmed, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane Library from inception to November 2024. Review Manager 5.3 was used to to draw a Cochrane bias risk. Inconsistency test and publication-bias were assessed by Stata 14.0. Random effect model was used to assemble direct and indirect evidences. The effects of the intervention were presented as mean differences with 95% confidence interval. Results: A total of 1921 patients from 37 RCTs were eventually included in our study. 23 RCTs evaluated probiotics, 10 RCTs evaluated synbiotics, 4 RCTs evaluated prebiotics, 3 RCTs evaluated FMT and one RCT evaluated antibiotics. Probiotics and synbiotics were associated with a significantly reduction in alanine aminotransferase [ALT, (MD: -5.09; 95%CI: -9.79, -0.39), (MD: -7.38, 95CI%: -11.94, -2.82)] and liver stiffness measurement by elastograph [LSM, (MD: -0.37;95%CI: -0.49, -0.25), (MD: -1.00;95%CI: -1.59, -0.41)]. In addition to, synbiotics was superior to probiotics in reducing LSM. Synbiotics was associated with a significant reduction of Controlled Attenuation Parameter [CAP, (MD: -39.34; 95%CI: -74.73, -3.95)]. Both probiotics and synbiotics were associated with a significant reduction of aspartate transaminase [AST, (MD: -7.81; 95%CI: -15.49, -0.12), (MD: -13.32; 95%CI: -23, -3.64)]. Probiotics and Allogenic FMT was associated with a significant reduction of Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance [HOMA-IR, (MD: -0.7, 95%CI: -1.26, -0.15), (MD: -1.8, 95%CI: -3.53, - 0.07)]. Probiotics was associated with a significant reduction of body mass index [BMI, MD: -1.84, 95%CI: -3.35, -0.33]. Conclusion: The supplement of synbiotics and probiotics maybe a promising way to improve liver-enzyme, LSM, and steatosis in patients with NAFLD. More randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the efficacy of FMT and antibiotics on NAFLD. And the incidence of adverse events of MTTs should be further explored. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42023450093.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.