ArticleHeliyon2025
Functional gastrointestinal disorders predictors in neonates and toddlers: A machine learning approach to risk assessment.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Acoustic Features, Parental Perception and Developmental Correlations of Crying in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant StudiesPooled it
- Beyond the Organic: A Biopsychosocial Analysis of Pediatric Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders-A Retrospective Chart Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Among Infants Aged 0 to 9 Months With Gastrointestinal Discomfort in China: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs) can pose a great burden on affected children, their families, and the healthcare system. Due to the lack of knowledge about the precise pathophysiology of FGIDs, a proper identification of children at risk to develop FGIDs has never been attempted. The research aims to identify early-life risk factors for FGIDs such as infantile colic, regurgitation, and functional constipation, within the first year of life. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study enrolled both term and preterm infants from a tertiary care university hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. The study employed both traditional statistical methods and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, specifically a random forest classification model, to identify key risk factors associated with the development of FGIDs. Based on these findings, an AI-based predictive model will be developed, along with a user-friendly, web-based interface designed for practical risk assessment. Results: 6060 infants were enrolled. 8.1 % were born preterm. According to random forest classification model by AI, birth weight (BW), cord blood pH, and maternal age were the most relevant variables linked to development of FGIDs in the first year of life. Some discrepancies between potential risk factors identified through conventional statistics and AI were detected. Conclusion: For the first time machine learning allowed to identify BW, cord blood pH and maternal age as important variable for risk prediction of FGIDs in the first year of life. This practical risk assessment tool would help clinicians to identify infants at risk of FGIDs who would benefit from a tailored preventive approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.