Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39834407›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Data-driven analysis of climate impact on tomato and apple prices using machine learning.

Sunghyun Yoon, Tae-Hwa Kim, Dong Sub Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sunghyun YoonDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Kongju National University, Cheonan, 31080, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Hwa KimDepartment of Community Development, Kongju National University, Yesan, 32439, Republic of Korea.
Dong Sub KimDepartment of Horticulture, Kongju National University, Yesan, 32439, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning has been used in various areas, but there are few studies on price prediction for agricultural products. Here, a machine learning technique for the price prediction of tomato and apple fruits was attempted based on environment and price data for 12 years. The goal of this study is to discover 1) how much can we accurately predict the product prices with the environmental factors and 2) how much each environmental factor affects to the product prices. This study assumes that the environmental factors directly affect crop growth and thus indirectly determine fruit production and accompanying price. In addition, it is assumed that there are two kinds of time lags, between the change in the environmental factors and their effects on the crop growth, and between the change in the crop growth and its effect on the price. In the process, machine learning techniques were used instead of econometric models commonly used in agricultural economics. The relationship between the environmental factors and fruit price with varying time lags in data-driven manner using long short-term memory (LSTM) was modeled in this study. The study empirically revealed that there are suitable time lags between the environmental factors and fruit price in the price prediction, and taking these time lags into the prediction improves the accuracy. Moreover, the importance of each of the environmental factors on the price using shapely additive explanations (SHAP) was demonstrated though this study, which assists the decision-making process in agriculture against the climate change.

Indexed as

Climate changeCloud amountLSTMTime delayTomato and apple prices

Identifiers

PMID39834407
PMCPMC11742837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.