Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39834399›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024

Cognitive component of auditory attention to natural speech events.

Nhan Duc Thanh Nguyen, Kaare Mikkelsen, Preben Kidmose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nhan Duc Thanh NguyenCenter for Ear-EEG, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kaare MikkelsenCenter for Ear-EEG, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Preben KidmoseCenter for Ear-EEG, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent progress in auditory attention decoding (AAD) methods is based on algorithms that find a relation between the audio envelope and the neurophysiological response. The most popular approach is based on the reconstruction of the audio envelope from electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. These methods are primarily based on the exogenous response driven by the physical characteristics of the stimuli. In this study, we specifically investigate higher-level cognitive responses influenced by auditory attention to natural speech events. We designed a series of four experimental paradigms with increasing levels of realism: a word category oddball paradigm, a word category oddball paradigm with competing speakers, and competing speech streams with and without specific targets. We recorded EEG data using 32 scalp electrodes, as well as 12 in-ear electrodes (ear-EEG) from 24 participants. By using natural speech events and cognitive tasks, a cognitive event-related potential (ERP) component, which we believe is related to the well-known P3b component, was observed at parietal electrode sites with a latency of ~625 ms. Importantly, the component decreases in strength but is still significantly observable in increasingly realistic paradigms of multi-talker environments. We also show that the component can be observed in the in-ear EEG signals by using spatial filtering. We believe that the P3b-like cognitive component modulated by auditory attention can contribute to improving auditory attention decoding from electrophysiological recordings.

Indexed as

auditory attention decodingcognitive processingear-EEGERPsP300

Identifiers

PMID39834399
PMCPMC11743694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.